#Underpass junkyard meriden ct install
Nu-Tec successfully installed the 20-inch HDPE water line pipe but encountered problems while attempting to install the 24-inch pipe. Nu-Tec began installing the water lines on June 24, 2002. Coughlin supplied the HDPE pipe in 50-foot sections, which it fused into single 600-foot pieces before Nu-Tec began installation. Although Nu-Tec was to install the pipe, Coughlin was responsible for purchasing the pipe and fusing the sections together under the parties' standard subcontract agreement. The plans and specifications authorized the use of directional drilling to install the new water lines with 20-inch and 24-inch high-density polyethylene (“HDPE”) pipe. Coughlin accepted a bid from Nu-Tec, as a subcontractor, to install two 600-foot replacement water lines on the project for approximately $99,000. On May 6, 2002, Coughlin, as the general contractor, entered into a contract with the City of Minot to construct the 16th Street Railroad Underpass Project for approximately $3.1 million.
![underpass junkyard meriden ct underpass junkyard meriden ct](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Tmx62D1j6kw/WZb78w4ruLI/AAAAAAAByz0/5yLs2Fdtdqw_TICnpzdVbUe7zgYbDe_HgCLcBGAs/s1600/20170817_120849.jpg)
We conclude the district court's award of damages is not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in piercing the corporate veil of Nu-Tec. They also appeal from an order denying their motion for amended findings. (“Coughlin”), $151,122 in damages, costs, and fees for breach of a construction contract. Balzer, Rudy Balzer, and James Balzer appeal from a judgment and amended judgment awarding Coughlin Construction Company, Inc. Lillehaug, Maring Williams Law Office, Fargo, N.D., for defendants and appellants. Dobrovolny, McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. Balzer, Rudy Balzer, James Balzer, Defendants and Appellants, Nils Nordin, individually, Defendant. COUGHLIN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v.